Mixed-Initiative Human-Automated Agents Teaming: Towards a Flexible Cooperation Framework

The recent progress in robotics and artificial intelligence raises the question of the efficient artificial agents interaction with humans. For instance, artificial intelligence has achieved technical advances in perception and decision making in several domains ranging from games to a variety of operational situations, (e.g. face recognition [51] and firefighting missions [23]). Such advanced automated systems still depend on human operators as far as complex tactical, legal or ethical decisions are concerned. Usually the human is considered as an ideal agent, that is able to take control in case of automated (artificial) agent's limit range of action or even failure (e.g embedded sensor failures or low confidence in identification tasks). However, this approach needs to be revised as revealed by several critical industrial events (e.g. aviation and nuclear power-plant) that were due to conflicts between humans and complex automated system [13]. In this context, this paper reviews some of our previous works related to human-automated agents interaction driving systems. More specifically, a mixed-initiative cooperation framework that considers agents' non-deterministic actions effects and inaccuracies about the human operator state estimation. This framework has demonstrated convincing results being a promising venue for enhancing human-automated agent(s) teaming

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)1.

In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field

Automatic recognition of the American sign language fingerspelling alphabet to assist people living with speech or hearing impairments

Sign languages are natural languages used mostly by deaf and hard of hearing people. Different development opportunities for people with these disabilities are limited because of communication problems. The advances in technology to recognize signs and gestures will make computer supported interpretation of sign languages possible. There are more than 137 different sign languages around the world; therefore, a system that interprets them could be beneficial to all, especially to the Deaf Community. This paper presents a system based on hand tracking devices (Leap Motion and Intel RealSense), used for signs recognition. The system uses a Support Vector Machine for sign classification. Different evaluations of the system were performed with over 50 individuals; and remarkable recognition accuracy was achieved with selected signs (100% accuracy was achieved recognizing some signs). Furthermore, an exploration on the Leap Motion and the Intel RealSense potential as a hand tracking devices for sign language recognition using the American Sign Language fingerspelling alphabet was performed.Universidad de Costa Rica/[320-B5-291]/UCR/Costa RicaMinisterio de Ciencia, Tecnología y Telecomunicaciones//MICITT/Costa RicaConsejo Nacional para Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas//CONICIT/Costa RicaUCR::Vicerrectoría de Investigación::Unidades de Investigación::Ingeniería::Centro de Investigaciones en Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación (CITIC)UCR::Vicerrectoría de Docencia::Ingeniería::Facultad de Ingeniería::Escuela de Ciencias de la Computación e Informátic